Paris Brown and her daily mail friends.

parisbrown

Been on the naughty step

Police commissioners (my blog) are a new role and while accountability is good thing rather than going to the usual suspects* that supposedly do that sort of thing these new bunch have been invisible in the public eye.

Paris Brown is the youth representative of the commissioners a job that still pays and the first to get some 4th estate column space for wrongdoings in social media in which she used her own name.  Moron – call me stupid but Ms Brown made this issue and when the porn empire of mr Desmond  calls her up on remarks in 140 characters its tears and tissue time nex to an responsible adult.

The adult commissioner who was a teacher also comes into the story for some reason and it appears that Ms Brown got a detention on the naughty step for thinking bad views seems a kind of duress by the establishment.   Quite what the fuss is about i dont know or care about either she was too un-homophobic** or pro drugs in such a matter that one assumes would offend the species of daily mail reader.  In short she is not one of them.

While the spotlight is good, it does raise questions about the calibre of humans in politics. Paris comes across as weak and perhaps not an ideal person to challenge the status quo. It appears that elected police commissioners (who?) are still not going to challenge anything like the previous thing.

* minorities (or known as the race relations industry) who made little difference over decades of being in a similair role   ** the views of the daily mail and its readers are not pro alternative lifestyle.

Censored by Murdoch the book Murdoch’s Pirates

Rupert MurdochISBN: 9781743311806 by Neil Chenowets is a book called Murdoch’s Pirates and Rupert Murdoch has super injunctioned this book.

This raises an interesting point – how would a regulator assess the influence of somebody like Murdoch when a book about them is censored by his evil empire.

It is a interesting question about ethics or lack of them in news international.  .

The monkey house flag in the flowerpot issue

flowersThe monkey house here at the zoo has a flower pot and on odd occasions as dictated by the alpha ape we stick a flag in it.  The flag a union jack is small envelope size and seems to keep our alpha happy.

Apparently in Belfast in Northern Ireland such display is a cause of riots by the human underclass.   Its humorous in a sense as they certainly have no concept of globalisation (my blog)  and the fact that many corporate entties really dont give a stuff about the nation state.

Not all northern ireland folk are feral but certainly with the funny views of a flag* it seems very much stupid issue to get ‘upset’ at.  Rather glad these feral weirdos dont visit the zoo and vandalise the flower pot**.

* prior to 1800 to win on a battlefield all you had to do was capture the colours of some army term for a group of men and you where declared the winner.  ** please keep the monkey house tidy.

Beyond Watford with Labour and the bbc.

Dont take my picture you evil terrorist picture taker you

Dont take my picture you evil terrorist picture taker you

Watford is famous for being the border between London and the north.  London according to Gordon Brown and the labour party is not in the UK (usually as nobody votes for them) and so the BBC moved past Watford to Manchester to be more ‘regional’ whatever that means*.

Yes  Manchester is a civilised place, it has running water and a sewage system and other attractions.  The cost of moving the bbc north is costing the bbc millions figures i know include 90 million to move staff,, and another 6 million on office furniture – [that's 41,237 tv license payers]

The bbc is a broadcaster, and while i would never deny them a chair, I do wonder about them making things when they spend six million quid on just that.

faggingOverall somebody at the labour party should get most of the blame.  Why well if the BBC cannot afford to make tv programs** then clearly the bbc while now being a bit more regional than perhaps it was before is now just a brilliant office furniture consumer and making tv and radio programs is just not the thing the bbc is supposed to do.

Thank you Labour party.

* northerners in eastenders perhaps ? ** even those made in Wales

Labours missing glucose syrup and Mark Lynas gmo debate issue

Dont take my picture you evil terrorist picture taker you

Dont take my picture you evil terrorist picture taker you

corncropFructose made from corn is not a sugar, or ‘evil’ salt as blamed by the labour party for fat.

However Fructose is blamed for a lot of people being fat as the body can not process it according to how people live and its found everywhere.  I wonder who is responsible for ignoring it. Somebody hates farmers and loves the processing companies it seems in the labour party – pro gmo.

Healthy eating might be a good aim but to blame just sugar and salt is a false flag.

For the good of the people – hardly.  I sense a bribe and some incompetent advisor’s advising.  Elite humans have a funny attitude to farming which along as the proles are fed they dont really care about the issue – aka let them eat cake.

While a lot of modern farming is best not described but it does explain why so many americans shoot each other rather than obtain a further hunting licence a further license once they own a gun or guns.

The gmo industry is not the nicest suing farmers for the wind but with the hate Mark Lynas brought to the table who else is going enter it and create ‘not evil’ competition.

Gmo does not get a free pass, or deserves it but with Lynas being a retard along with the organic types means the good or bad is harder to judge as with just blaming sugar and salt for the ills of a fat nation.

The age of deception, Mohamed Elbaradei

David Kaye stooge and idiot for the american right

isbn: 9781408822241 which covers the iaec and its ‘failures’ to find wmd for Blair and Bush raises some interesting points about politicians and things they set up in this case 1953 by an US Republican,.  Interesting or not  it seems that a 1953 view-point (later confirmed as truth)  was deemed a failure by Bush and his puppet Blair with David Kays help*..

Policing nuclear stuff means at some point some ignorant hick either a politician, journalist and spy will misrepresent something medical grade nuclear tech is one area so even a humble xray machine your dentist might have could be considered wmd  by some spy in m16 writing a dodgy dossier when it is not.

Elbaradei watched while Britain and america engineered the failings of hunting for mythical iraqi wmd and when it failed to find the non existant they then spend some billion extra with David Kays help to confirm what the iaec knew so overall what happened could only have happened.  The book visits the other fun places like north korea and iran too.

The book is interesting for pointing out that some facts are not deemed to be critical, if certain nations do them then thats very bad.  Another problem is the jewish problem being not signatory to iaec protocols and therefore making atomic projects desirable for others mentioning jews is apparently bad form when clearly israel is in the wrong side of bad form to start with.

Blair and his follow that us sheep policy with beckett (my blog) and straw (my blog) don’t come out of exchanges to well  and it can be said that us policy has torpedoed many agreements with rogue nations.

The book is an interesting look how the iaec has been abused by the hawks, and how that perception then affects rogue nations.  5/5 bananas.

* who later found no job with the hawks on offer

Chavs, Owen Jones

isbn: 9781844678648 was picked up for reading through a deep trawl through the ‘new’ library catalogue, oh and this although an revised edition had not been available until now unless some sort of thing like this happened (my blog) to the book when it went awol on its first attempt although i guess about it.

This is a book that documents the abuse of the word chav which has another meaning now that i imagine the inspector (see blogs i read) meets on a fairly regular basis and the abuse by even the political parties over a decade.  It is a book that will polarize you.  I use chav to either describe the lowest and most foolish [that includes businessmen and marketers too] and i have a selective use of it and i dont consider that i use it to excess.

I occasionally watch a series on television about how things are made, its fascinating as machine after machine in slow motion shows the process (through speed) from raw material to final product i dont think Mr Jones and i watch the same things but it might help him.

Karen Matthews a victim of Harry potters success

The polarization begins with Karen Matthews who the book treats not as a entrepreneur of crime but as a scape goat for the class war.  Perhaps that is a stretch of the word chav to begin with since the other family i also consider guilty as hell.

Mr Jones points out some good points  but does forget that the frying pan of press speculation also works both ways and nobody ever comes out without a few war wounds

The book is very one sided and calls the blue lot (not smurfs) evil people, even the police get called thugs so if your card carrying member of the guardian your be right at home.  Criticism of labour policies is very much in the lower orders and based on selected persons whom mentioned the R word..

With chavs comes a discussion of the R word that the two main parties dont like or are forbidden to discuss and Mr Jones lays into his subject matter as well on that point.

While everyone is not a chav its clear that both red and blue parties plus the media demonise them so this book can be seen as an attempt to make labour more electable but with wales,northern ireland and scotland going independent quite how relevant labour* will be in there appeal is an interesting point after all even guardian readers did not like Gordon Brown at the last election.

2/5 bananas – shelf  under how to win votes for the labour party.

* instigating those assembies, msps, etc

Politically incorrect dogma in child protection

Dont take my picture you evil terrorist picture taker you

Rotherham has a problem unless you vote for the red party (think gordon brown) then your an unfit parent.  This amazing statement from some bowels of a labour run authority and official guardian newspaper dogma perhaps shows why human adoption in the uk is in a bit of a pickle.

When child protection departments start labelling political parties good and bad then something is wrong with the social services dogma and that of the labour party trying to distance itself from its retarded friends in Rotherham faster than time travel..

One might say both sound something along the lines of idiots just following orders.  As some of those got jobs in sports perhaps there safer there.

Perhaps a promotion to sports administration for all concerned?

Willard and the Koch party

Milton Freidman (my blog) and Mr Gray of shades of grey fame was the final choice of the republican party candidate in an odd selection of choices (my blog).

Romney after all  is a corporate asset stripper [Bain] and his funny religion (my blog)and area make him clearly a man the Koch’s could get behind.

While Willard no doubt says the things that appeal to republican voters moving that message to appeal to the non Koch masses has caused him most trouble.  His actions (or those of Bain) are anti a good us economy for the people whom voted for him.

Perhaps what is ‘good’ for the Koch’s is not good for politics of the right, not that you could really call Obama left wing.

840 in the library queue (remember apparently people dont use them)

happy comrades queuing

Yes you read that correctly i am 578 in the waiting list for one book isbn:9780099579939 (my blog), yes it is good to see people do use there libraries so whether your red or blue in politics and think accounting means lets close libraries here.

Oh and another twenty or so people are after me while checking that number when i wrote this an hour later, more have since joined me after another edit and 620 ish is the standing number.

Anyhow that brings me to my library which was under threat and since saved through a mix of job losses and community helpers for free.

Scum

The perception is that for people like me whom use the library as a pickup place opposed to me asking them to reserve stuff for i will see little change.  For others [older] there will be change and so while perhaps not the largest savings in history it has sent a message to both red and blues that we like libraries and fuck off interfering yes even banana man.

So having saved the library again perhaps time will tell  if the thing was worth the battle.