Well it seemed a idea worth a test with the new printer (my blog) after all the low quantity hp inks will need replacing sooner rather than later and with heavy document printing in the month it was bought and with some months free its worth at least £26*. Either way the zoo would have to had buy ink for a printer unless you colllect printers that cannot print..
The instant ink wording is not nice – go over and charges are soon incurred so it probably is not for heavy users (300 pages a month) not that i or the zoo care if the ink is genuine or not (my blog). Lets face facts even you do not care about retail packaging – you just want ink not coloured cardboard packaging designed for a retailers point of sale displays .
The assumption here is that it theoretically brings down the cost of printing to what we would pay anyhow with non hp ink which is available for the printer. Savings of 30% are reduced to 10% if you switch benchmarks and use the guide price of non hp ink which is what i did as i am just that sort of ape. I wrote a spreadsheet so i have a fair idea – if i can ‘profit’ by comparing it to compatible ink then that seems a more reasonable comparison rather than just to hp ink
Duplex printing is accounted as two sheets, as to whether your printing is all colour, or mostly black and white is not a distinction made. The control panel is not part of hplip the linux driver and separate so another printer is something i am going to keep working and will purchase ink for it outright opposed to ‘renting’ pages.
Do these cartridges last longer than the retail ones ? no idea so far but expect a six day post delay from hp when sending ink – as hp supplied the starter inks and it was government form printing month here in the zoo perhaps instant ink is not as instant. A first impression although ink levels appear ok after minimal printing after those large government documents.
The delivery of replacement inks is not particularly fast but they also supply recycling envelopes which shows that non genuine ink suppliers have taught hp a thing or too.
The ink cartridges are longer than standard ones if standard one looks like a like van these look like an hgv however the basic hp supplied black ink crapped out at 89 pages, hp instant nk registers as that rather than hp ink The ink sensor did not detect that there was no black ink left – thats one failing hp have still yet to get right.
I had to replace one starter ink with the hgv sized ‘instant’ ink It appears that the mandatory test sheet for the scanner to verify the ink cartridge is counted as a paid sheet even though you did not desire to print it however i recorded it as a charge and then a few days later the counter was less one page. Non printed output is still charged despite the printer not printing the output correctly – something to be careful off.
I have more questions than answers, i imagine that print head cleaning is a costly business with e-ink and not recommended. A long term factor that will prove bad on the economics of instant ink. So i will return to this topic and bore you further! What exciting stuff.
As mentioned I still use a non instant ink laser printer for black and white things where the zoo pays £12 a cartridge. HP charges £ 60 for a 1500 page unit. You may see why i still compare non hp ink with instant ink despite the unfairness of the bigger size which is like comparing apples with oranges.
Only a fool would use hp sticker prices and i do not like to be called one of those.
Since i took the screenshot – instant ink has had a website ‘redesign’ which sucks imho.
If you are still awake after reading all that well done your prize is a banana skin which you can collect from the zoo.
*more if you use hp sticker prices – a month is classed as 30 days it appears