Raises a question – man with bots ? who never stops working, if so bias is implied and Wikipedia mean he controls it and if your not ‘Julian’ then do not even think about editing Wikipedia.
I don’t like Wikipedia (my blog) but to call wikipedia ‘open’ is debatable and perhaps verging on smear campaigns via ‘selected twisted facts’ and omission
Don’t trust wikipedia seems wise advise.
This is also not the first time they have been caught lying a religous ‘scholar’ who won arguments with i have a phd there but who did not was another example of wikipedia misuse that i know of.
If you think wikipedia is open then the sky is pink all the time and magical unicorn exist.